
It may be my imagination, but the way she talks about her career makes me think she misses being a member of Congress. She also seems disappointed by how her record was framed by her opposition and the tone of many of the attacks against her. I don’t presume to get into the difference between being biased versus being balanced in matters of the Beltway (at least not on this blog) but I think this is another example of the coarsening and polarization of our nation’s political discourse. Our Republic is worse off for it and lessens the prospect (as discussed below) of meaningful health care reform.
It’s a good thing I didn’t read the vituperative links before I ran into her, because I was charmed by this energetic, bespeckled, talkative bundle of energy with an astonishing depth of knowledge in topics including but not limited to Middle East, small business, information technology, South American trade and, of course, health care. She remains very interested in the progress of MHS, was concerned about the 5% savings requirement and agrees the non-equivalence of the intervention and control patients that emerged after randomization but before the intervention could be having a significant impact on the results.
She now ably advises clients of the Baker Donelson law firm as a senior public policy advisor and tells me she loves her work.
Asked how she feels about no longer being in Congress, Ms. Johnson gave me a big smile and said “It’s freeing. I can pay attention to topics for more than three minutes at a time.”
No comments:
Post a Comment